Endnote 20075/6/2023 ![]() Seven electronic databases were searched: AMED, Cochrane, PEDro, CINHAL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and MEDLINE.Įligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCT) and other trials with quantitative data. Systematic review informed by Cochrane and PRIMSA guidelines. To evaluate the outcomes of face-to-face, digital, and virtual modes of dancing for people living with Parkinson's disease (PD). Essa revisão sugere que o exercício físico pode ser protetivo à cognição de idosos. Além disso, foi evidenciado um efeito dose resposta, indicando que a alta intensidade e frequência dos exercícios físicos podem estar associadas à melhora, bem como um efeito agudo, em que os ganhos são mais acentuados nos primeiros meses de intervenção, tendendo à estabilização posterior. A maioria dos estudos tiveram qualidade metodológica moderada, indicando a necessidade de maior controle devieses em pesquisas futuras. Treze estudos preencheram os critérios de inclusão, dos quais nove encontraram um efeito de melhora e quatro de manutenção do exercício físico sobre as funções cognitivas. ![]() Foram incluídas pesquisas empíricas, que tinham intervenção por exercício físico com pessoas de 60 anos ou mais. As bases de dados consistiram em Scielo, MEDLINE, PsycINFO e Portal Regional da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), entre os anos de 2010 e 2020. O objetivo dessa revisão sistemática foi analisar e sumarizar as características dos estudos que avaliam o efeito do exercício físico nas funções cognitivas de idosos e apresentar possíveis variáveis relacionadas com a melhora na cognição. Similarly, the questions of new metrics of scientific output are addressed in the book.Īccess information in the Elsevier bookstore It encompasses the issues of big data, research data management and data literacy, which represent also a challenge both for the library and the communities of researchers. Among the multitude of issues, we introduce a new interface between information literacy and Research 2.0. A new approach in the book is that we take the relationship between information literacy and information overload into consideration. ![]() We did not forget that researchers clearly differ from the amateurs, populating social media, which means that these two different groups require different literacies. Computational thinking and the computational paradigm in a number of fields of research are taken into consideration, as well. ![]() Our book addresses these literacies from in the light of the changing research landscape characterized.īroad contexts of the researcher’s abilities, as adaptive and innovative thinking, problem solving skills, self-management or design mindset are examined shortly. From among the various types of relevant literacies, at least three types of literacies can be mentioned in this relation: information literacy, scientific literacy and academic literacy. This book that will appear soon, examines possible congruencies between information literacy and Research 2.0, because the work of today’s researcher mobilizes a number of literacies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |